Global warming: new controvesy?
Moderator: Major
Re: Global warming: new controvesy?
Hey, Caia... Eum. Have you considered moving to China? They don't buy this global warming crap over there! And the economy there is booming. And best of all: you don't have to vote!
So, don't waste any time and pack them bags.
So, don't waste any time and pack them bags.
- tekkamanblade
- Posts: 661
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:51 am
- Location: preaching on a street corner near you
Re: Global warming: new controvesy?
to M2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRp3iH86 ... re=related
to Caia
thats how they spun it, because they are reporting from the position that global warming is a fact to make sure the guy that owns their network and will be running the carbon tax exemptions program gets his way. the real facts are that they have doctored all the data, destroyed the real data, nasa did the same thing, and we have all known for years.
to madace
i agree fully that democracy is one of the worst systems of government, but i prefer it over neo-feudalism, which is indisputably what we're heading into thanks to the "humans are a plague killing the earth" hysteria these a55 clowns are whipping up with their man made global warming hoax. it shocks and sickens me that someone as ludicrously intelligent as you has been swindled by them, especially when you yourself understand the REAL dangers we are up against.
to nox
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRp3iH86 ... re=related
to Caia
thats how they spun it, because they are reporting from the position that global warming is a fact to make sure the guy that owns their network and will be running the carbon tax exemptions program gets his way. the real facts are that they have doctored all the data, destroyed the real data, nasa did the same thing, and we have all known for years.
to madace
i agree fully that democracy is one of the worst systems of government, but i prefer it over neo-feudalism, which is indisputably what we're heading into thanks to the "humans are a plague killing the earth" hysteria these a55 clowns are whipping up with their man made global warming hoax. it shocks and sickens me that someone as ludicrously intelligent as you has been swindled by them, especially when you yourself understand the REAL dangers we are up against.
to nox
akito wrote:lets pretend for a second that i work for playtechtonics and recieve a token bonus for each player i recruit. what sort of thing would i have to say about starport? would it be different from my current rhetoric about how god awful patches and empty permas have made it damn near unplayable? as an employee of toonces, totally dependant on maintaining his good graces, how do you think my rhetoric concerning him might shift?
this is why all the climate scientists say "more study is needed", because their job is to do those studies. who pays for the studies?
i feel this is a much more relevant question than "what does this or that study show", especially since 90% of all statistical percentages (including this one, haha) are made up on the spot or deviously manipulated to obtain the "desired" results.
however, lets assume for a moment that there is such a thing as man made global warming... how does a carbon tax help resolve this issue? a carbon tax will only serve to ship more industry over seas to "developing" nations that are immune to the decades old resolutions now going into effect. maybe if the plan to save us from ourselves wasn't envisioned in advance by the same people that engineered and then hyped up the crisis in the first place i would be more open to it?
Re: Global warming: new controvesy?
No.MadAce wrote:Hey, Caia... Eum. Have you considered moving to China? They don't buy this global warming crap over there! And the economy there is booming. And best of all: you don't have to vote!
So, don't waste any time and pack them bags.
Have you considered dropping dead? After all, one less person breathing out CO2 is gonna help save the planet, right?
Re: Global warming: new controvesy?
You first. With all the I love puppies coming out of your mouth it's bound to save on methane gas too.Caia wrote:No.MadAce wrote:Hey, Caia... Eum. Have you considered moving to China? They don't buy this global warming crap over there! And the economy there is booming. And best of all: you don't have to vote!
So, don't waste any time and pack them bags.
Have you considered dropping dead? After all, one less person breathing out CO2 is gonna help save the planet, right?
- nine-breaker
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:48 am
- Location: Locked in epic battle with Morgoth
Re: Global warming: new controvesy?
Yea, I heard, on nat geo, that cattle release more greenhouse gasses in one day, by deficating, than human make in a year driving vehicles, so in order to stop global warming, we must first eat all the cows. Problem solved.
Re: Global warming: new controvesy?
LOL. Yep, their breath is methane adn they are the leading producer of greenhouse gases LOL. And why was it that it took like half a topic for someone to finally give the real definition of a theory? I think it was on page THREE. I have not been posting on this topic much because i would rather stay out of a flame fest, but I LOL'ed when it took that long for what should have been on page 1.
- tekkamanblade
- Posts: 661
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:51 am
- Location: preaching on a street corner near you
Re: Global warming: new controvesy?
yah, they had to change the term to climate change when we started getting record breaking cold temperatures world wide. the propoganda movie day after tommorow where an ice storm forms from global warming apparently wasnt enough to play it off.
and building off of what caia said. if the world heated up, the amount of co2 the oceans could absorb before being "full" (saturated) would increase. its called super saturation, the hotter something is the more stuff it can dissolve, which is why i heat the water before i add my hot chocolate powder. currently, the ocean is not even saturated, much less super saturated. that means that until the ocean is saturated, all co2 will be harmlessly dissolved before doing anything to change climate, and also explains the correlation between temp and co2 levels.
and building off of what caia said. if the world heated up, the amount of co2 the oceans could absorb before being "full" (saturated) would increase. its called super saturation, the hotter something is the more stuff it can dissolve, which is why i heat the water before i add my hot chocolate powder. currently, the ocean is not even saturated, much less super saturated. that means that until the ocean is saturated, all co2 will be harmlessly dissolved before doing anything to change climate, and also explains the correlation between temp and co2 levels.
Re: Global warming: new controvesy?
Yea, I know, I'm a necro. Just saw this on yahoo though, and thought I'd share:
http://online.wsj.com/video/opinion-the ... mpvidcar_3
http://online.wsj.com/video/opinion-the ... mpvidcar_3
-
- Posts: 1329
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:57 am
Re: Global warming: new controvesy?
Yes, while global warming may be occuring, it is happening much slower than many scientists say, and some were even caught falsifying their data in favor of global warming.
Re: Global warming: new controvesy?
JesusRocks765 wrote:Yes, while global warming may be occuring, it is happening much slower than many scientists say, and some were even caught falsifying their data in favor of global warming.
This is complete and utter I love puppies.
-
- Posts: 1329
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:57 am
Re: Global warming: new controvesy?
I wish I had the article to show you.MadAce wrote:JesusRocks765 wrote:Yes, while global warming may be occuring, it is happening much slower than many scientists say, and some were even caught falsifying their data in favor of global warming.
This is complete and utter I love puppies.
- Destinybound
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:38 pm
- Location: RE-BANGING YOUR MOM.
Re: Global warming: new controvesy?
Since you don't have the article, I guess we'll just have to assume that what you said was I love puppies. There is no benefit of the doubt when it comes to global warming. Go watch an Inconvenient Truth, and imagine where America would be had we elected Al Gore instead of Bush...JesusRocks765 wrote:I wish I had the article to show you.MadAce wrote:JesusRocks765 wrote:Yes, while global warming may be occuring, it is happening much slower than many scientists say, and some were even caught falsifying their data in favor of global warming.
This is complete and utter I love puppies.
-
- Posts: 1329
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:57 am
Re: Global warming: new controvesy?
You must realize that I don't care much about global warming, and whether it is happening or not is of little concern to me.