Idea Emp Improvments Or Name Change

Ideas for improving Starport:GE

Moderators: Moleman, Kwijibo, Luna

Post Reply

Full EMP or Different name?

Full EMP
6
50%
Name Change
6
50%
 
Total votes: 12

User avatar
haloking1122
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 10:02 pm
Location: That one place where people go when they get banned
Contact:

Idea Emp Improvments Or Name Change

Post by haloking1122 » Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:48 am

This may have been touched already or may not have but here goes.

:) EMP - Electro Magnetic Pulse = :)
Knocks out anything having to do with electronics for a certain amount of time.

With this in mind i came to the conclusion that the Sethdar's EMP isn't a true EMP. it only knocks out the propulsion system of the targeted ship.

Im wondering if this can be modified (either in name or attributes) to make it a real EMP or some Engine Disruptor.

If it is to be changed it should also knock out the energy regen weapons and secondary weapon that way it would be a true EMP.

User avatar
Talak.Winstar
Posts: 2392
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: In Space, contemplating how exactly to negate the crappy events of OMD and BND story arcs.

Post by Talak.Winstar » Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:00 pm

I agree, toonces is all caught up in this conundrum about making colonies more realistic..... He should make the rest of the game more real as well...

Elemayo
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:27 am
Location: Summoning my war chinchilla pirate child amigo

Post by Elemayo » Sat Jun 30, 2007 6:07 pm

I think an Emp should stop a Turret for like 30 seconds.

User avatar
haloking1122
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 10:02 pm
Location: That one place where people go when they get banned
Contact:

Post by haloking1122 » Sat Jun 30, 2007 7:54 pm

Agreed the EMP should affect any electric device for a certain amount of time

MuTAnT
Posts: 1349
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:19 pm

Post by MuTAnT » Sat Jun 30, 2007 10:29 pm

I think ships in the future should have defences against EMP so maybe thrusters are the only vulnerability. Jet fighters NOW have defences against EMP so why would we have anything less in the future?
Last edited by MuTAnT on Sat Jul 07, 2007 1:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Naveed
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 12:23 am
Location: Covenant. p1. p2.

Post by Naveed » Sun Jul 01, 2007 2:32 am

MuTAnT wrote:I think ships in the future have defences against EMP so maybe thrusters are the only vulnerability. Jet fighters NOW have defences against EMP so why are would we have anything less in the future?
True.

If you wanna make it realistic, make it into a sonic wave, rather than a thing you shoot at someone. So when you push the secondary button, a halo-shape should expand from the ship (with a max radius of course.) This would make aiming a lot easier (of course), and would be more like a real emp bomb.

User avatar
Micool
Posts: 146
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:21 am

Post by Micool » Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:58 pm

I say keep its effect, its pretty good and balanced, but rename it:
EMDP. Electro-Magnetic Disruptor Projectile.
EMECB. Electro-Magnetic Energy Concentration Bomb
Or rename it to Dampener Sphere, and keep the effect, maybe tweak the graphics a bit to make it look like a sort of a bubble, and come up with a new explenation for the effect:
The dampener sphere attaches itself to the engines of the target, like a bubble, and absorbs the force coming from them, preventing them from having any effect.

MuTAnT
Posts: 1349
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:19 pm

Post by MuTAnT » Sat Jul 07, 2007 1:58 am

Micool wrote:...maybe tweak the graphics a bit to make it look like a sort of a bubble...
It used to look like the garbage barge's special weapon. =)
Change it back?

Post Reply