Dave34 wrote:Free lunch = shitty food. Cafeteria food isn't top quality, but it isn't bottom quality either. And 2.50 for a full meal isn't that bad, but if you are so fed up with having to spend money on food, just pack your own lunch, even though brining your own lunch is more expensive than buying it at school.
The High School I graduated from had some good teachers that actually knew how to teach what they were teaching. In my chemistry class if you failed it was because you failed not the teacher, and when you did fail, the teacher was there to help you understand why you weren't understanding. Those are the teachers we need in school.
Even if you shift schooling to the private sector the government will tax you for the same amount of money to buy their cocaine and hookers, I mean the government funded healthcare system we were promised when Obama got elected.
Dave34 wrote:Even if you shift schooling to the private sector the government will tax you for the same amount of money to buy their cocaine and hookers, I mean the government funded healthcare system we were promised when Obama got elected.
tekkamanblade wrote:the district admin, teachers, etc have not a whole lot to do with the problem. the problem is the origin and purpose of the school system itself. they were designed to turn children into factory slaves for the industrial revolution. they weren't designed to create well educated people capable of independent thought. the fact that its government funded should show you that. their only interest is amassing wealth and being secure in their power, and a free thinking well educated populace isn't conducive to that.
Henry wrote:The GPA system does need fixing, personally I find it too different for every school that its just unreliable. Ours makes the most sense, A at 92, which is a 4 in CP, 5 in honors, and 6 in AP, but w/e
I'm still waiting for our communist friend to challenge my capitalist ideals XD
oh and madace, i looked at those rules of logic or w/e you were on about. makes sense that stupidity rather than intentional ill will could be the cause of the majority of human suffering. i have never disagreed with this idea. but how OLD are they and where from? it could be possible that people were either more/less evil or more/less stupid across various times and regions. unless you are claiming that human nature is an unalterable universal constant immune to time/space.