3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

For non-Starport related topics

Moderator: Major

User avatar
CrazyChef
2010 Starport Champion
Posts: 1350
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 11:44 pm
Location: stuck at warp

3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by CrazyChef » Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:43 pm

Happy Pi day!

McGrod
Posts: 1837
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 5:50 am

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by McGrod » Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:47 pm

removed.
Last edited by McGrod on Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mel'Kaven
Posts: 2187
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:58 am
Location: Kittehville
Contact:

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by Mel'Kaven » Sun Mar 14, 2010 10:47 pm

big number... o.o

User avatar
kenoneill
Posts: 468
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:55 pm
Location: Republic of Ireland

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by kenoneill » Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:22 pm

Mel'Kaven wrote:big number... o.o
no its not, no matter how many digits you add to the end 4 is a bigger number :D

User avatar
ArdRhys4
Posts: 1862
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 12:22 am
Location: boundless sea and p4

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by ArdRhys4 » Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:18 am

3.15 is a bigger number ^^.

User avatar
Major
Posts: 1100
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:26 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by Major » Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:57 am

Image
Image

User avatar
ArdRhys4
Posts: 1862
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 12:22 am
Location: boundless sea and p4

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by ArdRhys4 » Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:29 am

Wow, I checked and double-checked that calculus problem and there were no mistakes. Very nice mind-duck.

User avatar
CrazyChef
2010 Starport Champion
Posts: 1350
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 11:44 pm
Location: stuck at warp

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by CrazyChef » Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:03 am

Image
Image

User avatar
Wagon
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:34 pm
Location: I love you man!

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by Wagon » Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:36 pm

Image
Last edited by Wagon on Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
gamanche
Posts: 1319
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:25 am
Location: a-c-e

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by gamanche » Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:42 pm

/love

User avatar
Jwilson6
Posts: 1609
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:27 pm

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by Jwilson6 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:38 pm

Major wrote: Image

Not only is that not calculus but its also incorrect.
----

I made apple and cherry pie to celebrate Pi day. :)

User avatar
ArdRhys4
Posts: 1862
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 12:22 am
Location: boundless sea and p4

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by ArdRhys4 » Thu Mar 18, 2010 4:53 am

Jwilson is right about it not being calculus. The fact that it is wrong is untrue. Every step is true. Using a few different mathematical properties, you can see that all steps are correct. I will go through each one.
  • 1: Since a == b, then a*a = a*b.
  • 2: Since you are subtracting b^2 from both sides, this is correct.
  • 3: All that has happened is that they have been factored.
  • 4: Divide (a-b) from both sides. This leaves (a+b) = b.
  • 5: Since a == b, then b == a so this works.
  • 6: a + a == 2a and a == a. This means that 2a == a.

Now, using a positive, a negative, and a non-positive/negative number in this.
  • Given: 0 = 0
  • 1: 0^2 = 0*0
  • 2: 0^2-0^2 = 0*0-0^2
  • 3: (0 - 0)(0 + 0) = 0(0 - 0)
  • 4: (0 + 0) = 0
  • 5: xxxxx

Actually, you know what? It is wrong. You cannot divide by zero as this would make the entirety of the statement untrue (or at least undefined/infinity). That is why it is wrong. Jwilson is right^^.

User avatar
Frozen.Soul
Posts: 139
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 8:32 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow...

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by Frozen.Soul » Thu Mar 18, 2010 11:10 pm

Mel'Kaven wrote:big number... o.o

User avatar
Barefoot
Posts: 1119
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 3:39 am
Location: South Carolina

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by Barefoot » Fri Mar 19, 2010 6:36 am

Since when did basic algebra get mistaken for calculus?

0zzy
Posts: 926
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 1:32 pm
Location: P1, 11th, a new hope, BR, DF, P3, Pegasus Cluster, your mothers room.

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by 0zzy » Fri Mar 19, 2010 5:51 pm

ArdRhys4 wrote:Jwilson is right about it not being calculus. The fact that it is wrong is untrue. Every step is true. Using a few different mathematical properties, you can see that all steps are correct. I will go through each one.
  • 1: Since a == b, then a*a = a*b.
  • 2: Since you are subtracting b^2 from both sides, this is correct.
  • 3: All that has happened is that they have been factored.
  • 4: Divide (a-b) from both sides. This leaves (a+b) = b.
  • 5: Since a == b, then b == a so this works.
  • 6: a + a == 2a and a == a. This means that 2a == a.

Now, using a positive, a negative, and a non-positive/negative number in this.
  • Given: 0 = 0
  • 1: 0^2 = 0*0
  • 2: 0^2-0^2 = 0*0-0^2
  • 3: (0 - 0)(0 + 0) = 0(0 - 0)
  • 4: (0 + 0) = 0
  • 5: xxxxx

Actually, you know what? It is wrong. You cannot divide by zero as this would make the entirety of the statement untrue (or at least undefined/infinity). That is why it is wrong. Jwilson is right^^.
Ya' think thats hard?

Who can do: 10 devided by 3 ?

User avatar
ArdRhys4
Posts: 1862
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 12:22 am
Location: boundless sea and p4

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by ArdRhys4 » Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:30 pm

Barefoot wrote:Since when did basic algebra get mistaken for calculus?
People are stupid xD. I already said that jwil was right. I had skimmed through it before and the idea was fine until you actually started plugging in numbers. Also, 10/3 = 3.333^^.

Mua'Dib
Posts: 589
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:18 am
Location: Frontier Wars
Contact:

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by Mua'Dib » Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:08 am

ArdRhys4 wrote:
  • Given: 0 = 0
  • 1: 0^2 = 0*0
  • 2: 0^2-0^2 = 0*0-0^2
  • 3: (0 - 0)(0 + 0) = 0(0 - 0)
  • 4: (0 + 0) = 0
  • 5: xxxxx
[/color]
Actually, you know what? It is wrong. You cannot divide by zero as this would make the entirety of the statement untrue (or at least undefined/infinity). That is why it is wrong. Jwilson is right^^.
It's better to plug in something other than zero for a/b.
  • Given: 5 = 5
  • 1: 5^2 = 5*5 = 25
  • 2: 5^2-5^2 = 5*5-5^2 = 0
  • 3: (5 - 5)(5 + 5) = 5(5 - 5) = 0
Now divide by zero(a - b) and you get...
  • 4: (5 + 5) = 5
  • 5: Dividing by zero: Not calculus, just wrong
[/color]

User avatar
Woots
Posts: 834
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:58 am

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by Woots » Sat Mar 20, 2010 8:57 pm

1+1=3

User avatar
ArdRhys4
Posts: 1862
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 12:22 am
Location: boundless sea and p4

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by ArdRhys4 » Sun Mar 21, 2010 12:36 am

Mua'Dib wrote:
ArdRhys4 wrote:
  • Given: 0 = 0
  • 1: 0^2 = 0*0
  • 2: 0^2-0^2 = 0*0-0^2
  • 3: (0 - 0)(0 + 0) = 0(0 - 0)
  • 4: (0 + 0) = 0
  • 5: xxxxx
[/color]
Actually, you know what? It is wrong. You cannot divide by zero as this would make the entirety of the statement untrue (or at least undefined/infinity). That is why it is wrong. Jwilson is right^^.
It's better to plug in something other than zero for a/b.
  • Given: 5 = 5
  • 1: 5^2 = 5*5 = 25
  • 2: 5^2-5^2 = 5*5-5^2 = 0
  • 3: (5 - 5)(5 + 5) = 5(5 - 5) = 0
Now divide by zero(a - b) and you get...
  • 4: (5 + 5) = 5
  • 5: Dividing by zero: Not calculus, just wrong
[/color]
I didn't plug in zero xD. And I said that Jwilson was right that it wasn't calculus at the beginning of my post. And yes, that is what I meant, anything minus itself == 0 which means that it is wrong.

Pink Floyd
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by Pink Floyd » Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:14 am

Image
Image

User avatar
nine-breaker
Posts: 1093
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:48 am
Location: Locked in epic battle with Morgoth

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by nine-breaker » Sat Mar 27, 2010 2:27 pm

Image

User avatar
SnakeEyes
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:19 am

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by SnakeEyes » Sat Mar 27, 2010 4:00 pm

0.99999999999999999... = 1

a = 0.999...
10a = 9.999...
10a - a = 9
9a = 9
a = 1
0.999... = 1

User avatar
ArdRhys4
Posts: 1862
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 12:22 am
Location: boundless sea and p4

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by ArdRhys4 » Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:33 pm

SnakeEyes wrote:0.99999999999999999... = 1

a = 0.999...
10a = 9.999...
10a - a = 9
9a = 9
a = 1
0.999... = 1
That has no mathematical basis. At all... To begin with, .9999... =/= 1. a is .999... in your problem as well... all you did was round and randomly just defy any law that posed a problem for you xD.

User avatar
SnakeEyes
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:19 am

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by SnakeEyes » Sat Mar 27, 2010 8:23 pm

ArdRhys4 wrote:
SnakeEyes wrote:0.99999999999999999... = 1

a = 0.999...
10a = 9.999...
10a - a = 9
9a = 9
a = 1
0.999... = 1
That has no mathematical basis. At all... To begin with, .9999... =/= 1. a is .999... in your problem as well... all you did was round and randomly just defy any law that posed a problem for you xD.
I'm sorry, but 0.99999... (9s until infinity) really IS 1.

User avatar
SnakeEyes
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:19 am

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by SnakeEyes » Sat Mar 27, 2010 8:42 pm

1/9 = 0.11111....
9*(1/9) = 9*(0.1111....)
1 = 0.9999....

same theorem, different proof :p

User avatar
nine-breaker
Posts: 1093
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:48 am
Location: Locked in epic battle with Morgoth

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by nine-breaker » Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:11 pm

SnakeEyes wrote:1/9 = 0.11111....
9*(1/9) = 9*(0.1111....)
1 = 0.9999....

same theorem, different proof :p
Great thing about math, you can make what ever you want, no matter how contradictory it may be, and just call it a theorem.

User avatar
ArdRhys4
Posts: 1862
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 12:22 am
Location: boundless sea and p4

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by ArdRhys4 » Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:33 pm

SnakeEyes wrote:1/9 = 0.11111....
9*(1/9) = 9*(0.1111....)
1 = 0.9999....

same theorem, different proof :p
THAT does make sense^^.

User avatar
gothicorpunk
Posts: 1175
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 10:43 pm
Location: retired classic homeworld's president
Contact:

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by gothicorpunk » Sat Mar 27, 2010 11:49 pm

ArdRhys4 wrote:
SnakeEyes wrote:1/9 = 0.11111....
9*(1/9) = 9*(0.1111....)
1 = 0.9999....

same theorem, different proof :p
THAT does make sense^^.
one thing .9999... plus .11111 is more then 1 and other thing u r so wrong its crazy lol

User avatar
CrazyChef
2010 Starport Champion
Posts: 1350
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 11:44 pm
Location: stuck at warp

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by CrazyChef » Sat Mar 27, 2010 11:55 pm

Einz is correct.

User avatar
SnakeEyes
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:19 am

Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

Post by SnakeEyes » Sun Mar 28, 2010 2:41 am

nine-breaker wrote:
SnakeEyes wrote:1/9 = 0.11111....
9*(1/9) = 9*(0.1111....)
1 = 0.9999....

same theorem, different proof :p
Great thing about math, you can make what ever you want, no matter how contradictory it may be, and just call it a theorem.
Contradictory? There's nothing contradictory about 0.999.. (9 to infinity) being equal to 1.

Post Reply